Landing page cost in 2026 sits between €2,500 and €5,000 for a professionally built launch site. Recent webvise offers for exactly this artifact ran between €2,500 and €4,900, fixed price, and the average project shipped in about three weeks.
German studios publish entry prices of €6,500 for the same job.
You want a number before you book a call, and most agency pricing pages refuse to give one. This article publishes the range from webvise's recent offers, the six scope drivers that move a quote, and the market prices to compare against. Every figure comes from a delivered project or an offer webvise actually sent, stated as a range wherever a client is involved.
- Recent webvise fixed-price offers for launch and company sites ran between €2,500 and €4,900. The entry anchor is €2,500.
- Three weeks is the average build time across 25+ delivered projects. A 61-page bilingual rebuild took one day; a 7-language 3D site took 4 weeks.
- Six scope drivers set the price: page count, languages, content migration versus new copy, forms and integrations, accessibility, and 3D or motion.
- The market comparison: H-Studio Berlin publishes websites from €6,500, Berlin MVP builds start at €18,000. webvise sits below both because AI-native delivery cuts build hours.
- Real scope lists included bilingual content migration, image optimization from 464 MB to 42 MB, WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, analytics, and a QA pass with zero console errors.
If your scope is already clear, webvise's landing page service lists what a fixed-price build includes, starting at €2,500. The rest of this article shows how that number moves.
The Real Range: €2,500 to €4,900
Recent webvise offers for launch and company sites ran between €2,500 and €4,900. Each one was a fixed price agreed before the build started, so the invoice held even when the work ran long.
€2,500 is the honest entry anchor for a professional build.
The money buys concrete line items. These come from real webvise scope lists, so treat them as the minimum a serious quote should itemize:
- Bilingual content migration. Existing pages move into the new site in two languages, cleaned up along the way.
- Image optimization. One project's media library shrank from 464 MB to 42 MB before launch.
- Accessibility to WCAG 2.2 AA. The German BFSG has applied to consumer-facing digital services since June 2025, so this is a legal line item.
- Analytics set up before launch. The first campaign produces data from day one.
- A QA pass with zero console errors. Every page loads clean before handover.
Six Scope Drivers You Can Check Yourself
Two landing pages with the same layout can differ by over two thousand euros in build effort. Six drivers explain nearly every gap between webvise offers, and all six are visible from outside. Score your own project before you request a quote anywhere.
| Scope driver | Why it moves the price | Seen in webvise projects |
|---|---|---|
| Page count | Every page needs design, content, and QA | One rebuild covered 61 pages in two languages |
| Languages | Each locale multiplies content and QA work | The Old World Labs site shipped in 7 languages |
| Migration vs. new copy | Old content needs cleanup, new copy needs writing | One media library went from 464 MB to 42 MB during migration |
| Forms and integrations | Each endpoint needs setup and testing | Lead forms and analytics sit in every launch scope |
| Accessibility | WCAG 2.2 AA takes audit and fix time | Required under the German BFSG since June 2025 |
| 3D and motion | Custom scenes cost design and performance work | The 7-language 3D build took 4 weeks instead of 3 |
Count your drivers, then send the list to webvise. A one-language site with five pages and a contact form lands at the bottom of the range. Seven languages plus 3D lands at the top, or beyond it.
Three Weeks Is the Average, With Outliers in Both Directions
webvise has delivered 25+ projects at a 3-week average to launch. The average holds because delivery is AI-native: webvise.io itself is 100% AI-coded via Claude Code, and client builds run through the same tooling. The full workflow is documented on this blog.
The fast outlier is a 61-page bilingual site rebuilt in one day with that tooling. The scope was pure migration: content existed in both languages, no new copy, no 3D.
The slow outlier is Old World Labs: 7 languages and custom 3D pushed the build to 4 weeks. Both drivers were visible before the first line of code, and so was the extra week.
Where the Range Sits in the German Market
H-Studio Berlin publishes websites from €6,500. Berlin studios offer MVP builds from €18,000, a different artifact with application logic inside. Both are honest published prices for classic delivery models.
| Offer | Published entry price | What it is |
|---|---|---|
| webvise launch site | from €2,500, fixed price | Custom landing or company site, about 3 weeks |
| H-Studio Berlin website | from €6,500 | Classic studio website build |
| Berlin MVP sprints | from €18,000 | Software MVP, a different artifact |
A lower price has to come from fewer hours or thinner scope, and any vendor should tell you which. For webvise the answer is public: AI-native delivery cuts build hours while the scope list stays the same. That claim is checkable, the studio's own site is the proof.
When the Budget Question Is Bigger Than a Landing Page
A landing page budget answers one narrow question: what it costs to put one offer online fast. Once the project needs a login area, checkout, dashboards, or an application workflow, the artifact changes and the range moves with it. The broader guide, how much does a website cost in 2026, applies the same range logic to full websites and platforms.
webvise builds landing pages and launch sites at a fixed price, most of them live within three weeks. Send your offer and your driver count via the contact form, and a fixed number comes back itemized against the six drivers above.